送交者: 008 于 2008-01-03, 17:33:23:

回答: 抱歉！等了很久才能发贴。不知到你的逐步完善是按什么标准定义的。但 由 肥肥 于 2008-01-03, 17:10:09:

• BTW, the Quine-Dehum Thesis is anything but old. - 肥肥 (111 bytes) 2008-01-03, 17:46:06 (195670)
  • it is still old, even if you have just said it just now. (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2008-01-03, 21:00:32 (195705)
• You missed the point. No one is trying to replace the experimental - 肥肥 (342 bytes) 2008-01-03, 17:43:56 (195668)
  • what is "truh"? If we can find something works well, why do we need the "truh" (无内容) - forex (0 bytes) 2008-01-03, 18:14:13 (195684)
    • Sorry. Should be truth (无内容) - 肥肥 (0 bytes) 2008-01-03, 19:49:10 (195691)
  • 咱乡下人的理解：那也不能听到毛姑姑叫就不种庄稼呐。 (无内容) - 短江学者 (0 bytes) 2008-01-03, 17:49:37 (195672)
    • 烦科学文化人理解：没了你张屠户还非得吃毛猪？ (无内容) - LB (0 bytes) 2008-01-03, 18:22:17 (195686)

加跟贴